| Home
ODSP News Opinions Links |
|
| On Wednesday
July 11, 2007 a Charter Challenge was filed with the Ontario Superior
Court of Justice. |
Court File No: ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE b e t w e e n: DAVID THOMASSON Applicant and ONTARIO MINISTRY OF COMMUNITY AND SOCIAL SERVICES; DIRECTOR OF INCOME SUPPORT (CORNWALL) and SOCIAL BENEFITS TRIBUNAL Respondents notice of constitutional question The plaintiff intends to question the constitutional validity of the and to claim a remedy under subsection 24 (1) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms in relation to an act or omission of the Government of Ontario. The question is to be argued on , , at , at . The following are the material facts giving rise to the constitutional question: 1. The applicant, David Thomasson, is a person with a disability as defined under the Ontario Disability Support Program (ODSP); 2. The applicant farms as part of his therapy for his disability; 3. The applicant has created a market share for his organically grown vegetables in exclusive restaurants in Ottawa; 4. The applicant has been certified as an organic farmer and his farm has been registered as a farm and subject to the benefits attributable to being a registered farm; 5. The applicant, in order to maintain his market share, had to hire farm help for seeding and picking, in 2005; 6. The applicant had to name the farm help as an employee under the provisions of the Canadian Revenue Agency (CRA) and pay employee source deductions to the CRA for the farm help; 7. The applicant maintains that the farm help was an essential expense for his farm and the expense did result in greater production and enabled the applicant to maintain his market share; 8. The applicant, in abiding with the provisions of CRA, cannot claim under the ODSP that the farm help was under contract as he was paid as an employee of the farm in accordance with the provisions of CRA; 9. The applicant explained to the Director that there was no contract for his farm help in 2005 and prior to hiring the employee, sent the Director a letter stating that the person was required to be considered as an employee and provided to the Director the amount that the person was being paid; 10. The Director ODSP in 2005 never sent the applicant any alternatives to the CRA process; 11. In 2006, the Director ODSP requested a contract for the employee of 2005, which could not be provided as the farm help was hired as an employee and not under a contract; 12. In January 2007, the Director ODSP denied the farm expense of the farm help in 2005 and claimed that the applicant's income was greater than reported and thus the applicant was in an over-payment situation; 13. The applicant requested reconsideration, which was denied, and the applicant appealed the decision of the Director to the Social Benefits Tribunal (SBT); 14. Where the SBT, under the enabling Legislation, cannot hear a Constitutional Question, the applicant is required to bring this Notice to the Ontario Superior Court of Justice. The following is the legal basis for the constitutional question: 15.. Does the interpretation of the Minister's Directive 5.1-5.7, for the calculations of income by the Director under ODSP discriminate against persons with disabilities, who want to be farmers and restrict a person with a disability in the pursuit of their life, liberty and security of the person in violation of the principles of fundamental justice? 16. Whereas, the Minister's Directive 5.1, states: "Wages to Employees: Wages paid to employees of the farm are not approved expenses. Related payroll expenses (e.g., income tax, Employment Insurance (EI), Canada Pension Plan (CPP), Workplace Safet y and Insurance Benefits (WSIB) are also not approved expenses. The recipient may deem this expense as necessary; however, it is not an approved expense and is considered earned income. If the recipient claims wages and related expenses, it should not be allowed as a farm expense." 17. Whereas the actions of the Director in following this Ministerial Directive constitutes a discriminatory act whereby the Government of Ontario is in fact treating persons with a disability who attempt to make a living by farming different than persons who are not disabled and elect to farm for a living. Such an action on the part of the Director is contrary to the provisions of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, section 7 which protect the individuals "life, liberty and security of the person in accordance with the fundamental principles of natural justice" and section 15 which protect the rights of persons with disabilities to "equal treatment under the law." Date: July 11, 2007 GREEN & VESPRY LAW OFFICES 200-190 O'Connor Streeet Ottawa, ON K2P 2R3 Terrance Green Tel: 613-560-6565 ext. 22 Fax: 613-560-0545 Solicitor for the Plaintiff David Thomasson TO The Attorney General of Ontario Constitutional Law Branch 4th floor 720 Bay Street Toronto, Ontario M5G 2K1 Fax: (416) 326-4015 The Attorney General of Canada Justice Building 239 Wellington Street Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H8 Fax: (613) 954-1920 Ministry of Community and Social Services Eastern Region 10 Rideau Street, 7th Floor Ottawa, Ontario K1N 9J1 Director of Income Support (Cornwall) Ministry of Community and Social Services 4 Montreal Road, 3rd Floor Cornwall, Ontario K6H 1B1 Fax: (613) 993-0354 Social Benefits Tribunal 1075 Bay Street, 7th Floor Toronto, Ontario M5S 2B1 Fax: (416) 326-5135 |
|
This web page is posted
and maintained by: Malcolm Dilts Midland, Ontario email: mm@magmac.ca If you have arrived at this page from another site please visit the ODSP Support & Activism Site |
Click here to Close this Browser Window This feature may not work with your browser. If your browser does not close automatically please close manually. |